tex
Full Member
Posts: 166
|
Post by tex on Feb 21, 2014 23:03:22 GMT -5
OXFORD, Miss. — The University of Mississippi said Friday that students could face criminal charges for placing a noose on a statue honoring the college’s first black student, and a fraternity announced that it had expelled three men because of the incident. Sigma Phi Epsilon, a social fraternity on campus, said in a statement that the men were a part of the group’s chapter at the university. The chapter, which said it told investigators about the role its members may have played in the vandalism, was suspended. The university said its inquiry led law enforcement officials to seek interviews with three students, all of them white 19-year-old freshmen from Georgia. But the students, whom the university did not identify because of an educational privacy law, refused through their lawyers to meet with the authorities unless investigators secured arrest warrants. www.nytimes.com/2014/02/22/us/officials-seek-to-question-3-ole-miss-students-in-racist-episode.html?_r=0
|
|
|
Post by anncoulter on Feb 21, 2014 23:16:56 GMT -5
"criminal charges for placing a noose on a statue"
Wonder what law was broken?
|
|
|
Post by Tom Earp on Feb 22, 2014 10:10:16 GMT -5
The law of stupidity. Oh thats right, no such law!!!
PCNess at its best.
|
|
|
Post by dekeguy on Feb 24, 2014 12:20:32 GMT -5
A noose on a statue? Huh? Who did the statue depict? What is the deal here? Like Tom says, there's no law against stupidity. Criminal charges? On what basis?
|
|
|
Post by Tom Earp on Feb 24, 2014 13:45:25 GMT -5
No law on bad taste, but could use the old hate crime law.
dekeguy, any thoughts on that?
|
|
|
Post by dekeguy on Feb 24, 2014 15:33:27 GMT -5
No law on bad taste, but could use the old hate crime law. dekeguy, any thoughts on that? Tom, I think it would be hard to convict anyone of a hate crime against a statue. If the court was particularly PC then anything could happen, but, a hate crime should be directed against a person or a specific group. The statue commemorates an historical event so unless there is a law that specifically prohibits comments against history I think a good lawyer would be able to get any indictment quashed. Considering the event commemorated by the statue happened many years ago it would be like charging someone from New Orleans with a hate crime for verbally or physically objecting to (but not damaging) a statue of General Ben (Beast) Butler. As there was no damage to the statue and no one personally injured what would be the basis of the indictment?
|
|